Cardiopulmonary Testing for CTED

Eric Robbins, MD

Educational Objectives

  • Discuss possible exercise limitations after a complicated ICU course
  • Describe Fick equation and its variables that contribute to oxygen delivery
  • Describe features of CPET testing that would indicate ventilatory limitation to exercise
  • Differentiate the CPET profile of a cardiac vs. pulmonary vascular limitation to exercise
  • Discuss the role of invasive exercise hemodynamics

Clinical Scenario

Index Hospitalization

  • 47M with recent hospitalization for bacterial PNA, course c/b acute bilateral PEs with shock.

  • Received thrombolytics.

  • Course further complicated by empyema, pneumothorax, and persistent air leak on his chest tube.

  • Intubated for 10 days.

  • Hospitalized for 8 weeks in total.

  • Discharged on a DOAC with excellent adherence.

He has a New Exercise limitation

You see at 3 months post-discharge.

  • Finished PT.

  • Exercise capacity:

    • currently, 20 min daily on elliptical with significant DOE
    • pre-hospital, 60+ min without dyspnea.
  • At home, intermittent desats to 85% with exertion.

Testing Results

PFTs

FEV1 75%, FVC 75%, FEV1/FVC 0.77

TLC 76%, DLCO 81%

MIP/MEP WNL

TTE

LV: normal size and function. normal diastology

Valves: WNL

RV: normal size and function

RVSP: ~25 mmHg, with IVC collapsing

Question 1

Part 1: In general, what mechanisms of exercise limitation might be considered in a post-ICU patient?

Generalized

  • Deconditioning

Neurologic

  • sequelae from critical illness myopathy (CIM)

Pulmonary

  • Restriction
  • Upper airway pathology
  • Vascular disease

Hematologic

  • anemia

Cardiac

  • residual stress-induced cardiomyopathy

Part 2: What could account for the exercise limitation in this patient?

Generalized

  • Deconditioning

Neurologic

  • sequelae from critical illness myopathy (CIM)

Pulmonary

  • Restriction
  • Upper airway pathology
  • Vascular disease

Hematologic

  • anemia

Cardiac

  • residual stress-induced cardiomyopathy

Question 2

Part 1: What is the incidence of exercise limitation after an episode of pulmonary embolism, and why are people limited?

Mild

  • 50-70%, when defined as sub-maximal \(VO_{2}\) on CPET

Severe

  • CTEPH: 4%

In Between?

  • CTED: 25-50% VQ defects, 20% RV dysfunction, 10% moderate to severe DOE

Question 3

State the Fick equation.

\(VO_{2} = (CO) \cdot (C_{a}O_{2} - C_{v}O_{2} )\)

i.e., (blood volume delivered) * (blood oxygen extracted)

Question 4

What pathophysiological processes are “packaged” within in the \(AV O_{2}\) content difference term?

In other words, what categories of pathology would be taken into account by this equation?

\(VO_{2} = (CO) \cdot (C_{a}O_{2} - C_{v}O_{2} )\)

\(= (CO) \cdot [(\)change in O2 content\() \cdot (\)amount of blood\()]\)

\(= (CO) \cdot [(S_{a}O_{2} – M_{v}O_{2}) \cdot (Hgb \cdot 1.34)]\)

What pathophysiological processes are “packaged” within in the \(AV O_{2}\) content difference term?

\(VO_2= (CO) \cdot [(S_{a}O_{2} – M_{v}O_{2}) \cdot (Hgb \cdot 1.34)]\)

\(S_{a}O_{2}\): lung problems (gas exchange)

\(M_{v}O_{2}\): muscular utilization of oxygen & distribution of blood flow to periphery

\(Hgb\): anemia, hemoglobinopathies

Question 5

What is \(\frac{V_{E}}{VCO_{2}}\), conceptually?

NOTE:

  • \(V_{E}\) = minute ventilation

  • \(VCO_{2} \approx CO_{2}\) production

  • i.e., “how much minute ventilation you must perform to remove a given amount of \(CO_{2}\)
  • i.e., how much minute ventilation is occurring per 1 L of \(CO_{2}\) production

Often referred to has the ventilatory efficiency

Question 6

What CPET parameters suggest a primary cardiac limitation?

Evidence of a disproportionate HR increase to augment CO

  1. reduced peak “\(O_{2}\) pulse” (a.k.a \(\frac{VO_{2}}{HR}\))
  • reflects reduced stroke volume (LVEF estimator)
    • why: if \(\uparrow VO_{2}\) but \(\uparrow\uparrow HR\), \(\downarrow \frac{VO_{2}}{HR}\)
  • If you can’t augment stroke volume, you only have heart rate left!

What CPET parameters suggest a primary cardiac limitation?

  1. low heart rate reserve
  • (\(HRR = HR_{max} - HR_{predicted}\))
  1. \(\downarrow\)reduced peak \(VO_{2}\)
  2. early anaerobic threshold (AT)

Question 7

Which parameters suggest a pulmonary vascular limitation to exercise?

Similar yet distinct from cardiac limitation

  • How PVD limitations differ from primary cardiac limitations
    1. desaturation during exercise
    2. elevated \(\frac{V_{d}}{V_{t}}\) (physiologic dead space:tidal volume ratio)

Which parameters suggest a pulmonary vascular limitation to exercise?

  • elevated \(\frac{V_{d}}{V_{t}}\)
    • that is, evidence of higher-than-expected dead space for a given tidal volume
    • suggests ventilatory inefficiency (\(\uparrow\frac{V_E}{VCO_2}\)), but assumes patient not hyperventilating

Which parameters suggest a pulmonary vascular limitation to exercise?

NOTE: \(\frac{V_{d}}{V_{t}}\) requires arterial blood to measure.

If your patient doesn’t have an arterial line placed for their CPET, computers estimate \(\frac{V_{d}}{V_{t}}\) from $ETCO2

However, this assumes ventilatory inefficiency is to blame for the abnormal \(\frac{V_{d}}{V_{t}}\)

In lungs with significant PVD, ETCO_2 does not accurately reflect arterial values (why: increased VQ mismatch!)

Which parameters suggest a pulmonary vascular limitation to exercise?

Important

The computer value usually underestimates abnormal dead spaces in diseased lungs

Tip

If you’re concerned about PVD in a patient without direct arterial sampling during their CPET, but \(\frac{V_{d}}{V_{t}}\) is only “mildly” or “moderately” elevated, that should NOT reassure you!

Question 8

Which pattern of exercise limitation is present in this patient?

measurement

patient

predicted

percent_predicted

peak VO2

1,857 mL/min

3,172 mL/min

59%

max heart rate

144

174

74%

O2 pulse

13 mL/beat

18 mL/beat

71%

lowest SpO2

80%

>95%

breathing reserve

47%

>30%

ETCO2 at AT

32

VE/VCO2

36

<33

resting Vd/Vt

0.32 (0.29

<0.4

peak Vd/Vt

0.4 (0.24

<0.25

Which pattern of exercise limitation is present in this patient?

measurement

patient

predicted

percent_predicted

interpretation

peak VO2

1,857 mL/min

3,172 mL/min

59%

he has an exercise limitation

max heart rate

144

174

74%

174 - 144 = 30, and 30 > 15, so this looks fine

O2 pulse

13 mL/beat

18 mL/beat

71%

low. SV doesn't respond appropriate to exercise; cardiac (or PVD) issue

lowest SpO2

80%

>95%

exertional desaturation is rarely cardiac related; PVD or pulmonary issue

breathing reserve

47%

>30%

he has plenty of tidal volume / minute ventilation to spare; unlikely restrictive disease

ETCO2 at AT

32

difficult to interpret, since above suggests PVD

VE/VCO2

36

<33

ventilatory inefficiency

resting Vd/Vt

0.32 (0.29

<0.4

arterial numbers show paradoxical increase in Vd/Vt; suggests PVD

peak Vd/Vt

0.4 (0.24

<0.25

ditto

Which pattern of exercise limitation is present in this patient?

  • Desats with exercise
  • \(\uparrow \frac{V_d}{V_t}\)
  • \(\downarrow O_{2}\) pulse despite sufficient HRR

Conclusion: pulmonary vascular limitation!

Question 9

Does he have CTEPH?

Reminder: CTEPH requires resting pulmonary hypertension. one can have dysfunction with exertion but be “normal” at rest.

item measurement
RA 2 mmHg
PA 27/8 (17) mmHg
PCWP 4 mmHg
tCO 6.2 L/min
PVR 2 WU

What Happens when we exercise him?

item measurement
RA 12 mmHg
PA 100/25 (56) mmHg
PCWP 17 mmHg
tCO 15 L/min
PVR 2.6 WU

Eric Question: Does he have exercise-induced PH?

\(TPR = \frac{mPAP}{CO} = \frac{56}{15} =\) 3.73

YES to eiPH!

However, we need to confirm why / how TPR increased.

Eric Question: Does he have exercise-induced PH?

\(PVR = \frac{mPAP - PCWP}{CO}\)

\((PVR)\cdot (CO) = mPAP - PCWP\)

\((PVR)\cdot (CO) + PCWP = mPAP\)

\(TPR = \frac{mPAP}{CO}\)

\(TPR = \frac{(PVR)\cdot(CO) + PCWP}{CO}\)

Eric Question: Does he have exercise-induced PH?

Note

\(TPR = \frac{(PVR)\cdot(CO) + PCWP}{CO}\)

So an increase in TPR can be driven by an increase in PVR or PCWP (or both)

Cutoffs: PCWP <20 mmHg or \(\frac{PCWP}{CO}\) < 2 (our patient: 1.13)

Thus, exercise-induced PH from \(\uparrow PVR\) is likeliest here

Question 10

Describe the normal hemodynamic response to exercise and contrast it to this patient.

  • steady increase in CO, mPAP, PCWP is normal
  • PVR mildly decreases
  • \(TPR = \frac{mPAP}{CO}\) modestly decreases

our patient:

  • PVR: 2.0 \(\rightarrow\) 2.6
  • TPR: 2.75 \(\rightarrow\) 3.73

Question 11

Will a heart transplant improve this patient’s exercise tolerance?